Home| Contact Us| New Journals| Browse Journals| Journal Prices| For Authors|

Print ISSN: 0976-9005
Online ISSN:
0976-9013


  About JIC
  DLINE Portal Home
Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
Current Issue
Next Issue
Previous Issue
Sample Issue
Upcoming Conferences
Self-archiving policy
Alert Services
Be a Reviewer
Publisher
Paper Submission
Subscription
Contact us
 
  How To Order
  Order Online
Price Information
Request for Complimentary
Print Copy
 
  For Authors
  Guidelines for Contributors
Online Submission
Call for Papers
Author Rights
 
 
RELATED JOURNALS
Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM)
International Journal of Computational Linguistics Research (IJCL)
International Journal of Web Application (IJWA)

 

 
Journal of Intelligent Computing
 

The Multi-agent System a Key Pillar in e-assessment for a real Competency Mapping
AichiYassir, Bassiri Mustapha, Said Belaaouad, Said Benmokhtar
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials, Ben M’Sik Faculty of Sciences, Hassan II University of Casablanca, BP 5366 Maarif, Casablanca, Morocco & ENS Casablanca, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco
Abstract: The e-assessment is a subject that has not ceased to arouse the interest of researchers in any field. Our study focuses on the architecture and modeling of e-assessment platforms and the impact of the multi-agent system on talent measurement. We define a metamodel describing the operating paradigm of this tool. The peculiarity of our application framework lies in the study of the last four ITEF master classes at Hassan II University. For this study, we used the “Innermetrix” tool, an e-assessment platform ranked number 1 worldwide. The objective of this article is to have real competency mapping by defining a digital student repository associated with a digital study agent able to test and evaluate the soft skills of students in terms of output. The objective is to evaluate the cognitive-behavioral dimensions of students after spending two years in a training that combines a theoretical component and another practice.
Keywords: E-Assessment, Multi-Agent System (MAS), Competency Mapping, Innermetrix, Soft Skills The Multi-agent System a Key Pillar in e-assessment for a real Competency Mapping
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jic/2019/10/4/128-136
Full_Text   PDF 1.7 MB   Download:   33  times
References:

[1] Di Bitonto, P., Laterza, M., Roselli, T., Rossano, V. (2010). An Evaluation Method for Multi-Agent Systems. In: Jêdrzejowicz, P., Nguyen, N. T., Howlet, R. J., Jain, L. C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2010. LNCS, 6070, 32–41.
[2] Hendrickx, J., Martin, S. (2016). Open multi-agent systems: Gossiping with deterministic arrivals and departures. In: 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.
[3] Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14.
[4] Varma, V., Morarescu, I. (2017). Modeling stochastic dynamics of agents with multi-leveled opinions and binary actions, In: Proc. of the 56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
[5] Gutiérez, C., García-Magariño, I., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. (2009). Evaluation of Multi-Agent System Communication in INGENIAS.
In: Cabestany, J., Sandoval, F., Prieto, A., Corchado, J. M. (eds.) IWANN 2009. LNCS, 5517, 619–626.
[6] Stocker, A., Shaheen, S. (2018). Shared Automated Mobility: Early Exploration and Potential Impacts, In: Road Vehicle Automation, 4, 125–139.
[7] Xu, J., Tekin, C., Zhang, S., Van der Schaar, M. (2015). Distributed multi-agent online learning based on global feedback, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63 (9) 2225-2238.
[8] Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 115 – 152.
[9] Wandel, A. P., Robinson, C., Abdulla, S., Dalby, T., Frederiks, A., Galligan, L. (2015). Students’ mathematical preparation: Differences in staff and student perceptions. I. J. of Innovation in Science and Math. Education, 23(1).
[10] Vojak, C., Kline, S., Cope, B., McCarthey, S., Kalantzis, M. (2011) New spaces and old places: An analysis of writing assessment software. Computers & Composition, 28, 97–111.
[11] Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K. (1999). Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology. In: Proceedings of EdMedia ’99.
[12] Aven, T. (2016). Ignoring scenarios in risk assessments: understanding the issue and improving current practice. Reliab Eng Syst Safvol 20, 145 - 215.


Home | Aim & Scope | Editorial Board | Author Guidelines | Publisher | Subscription | Previous Issue | Contact Us |Upcoming Conferences|Sample Issues|Library Recommendation Form|

 

Copyright 2011 dline.info