| Are Humans getting Smarter due to AI? | Matjaz Gams
Department of Intelligent Systems, Jozef Stefan Institute & Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia | | Abstract: Humans are getting smarter due to use of tools, in history because of mechanical tools and in recent decades due to information tools. The hypothesis in this paper goes a step further: that we are getting smarter due to use of AI. The thesis is indicated by solutions to three well-known logical paradoxes that have been recently resolved by the author of this paper: the unexpected hanging paradox, the Pinocchio paradox and the blue-eyes paradox. This paper is a bit shorter version of the Informatica paper on the same issue [19]. | | Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Information Management Are Humans getting Smarter due to AI? |
| DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jitr/2019/10/3/92-97 |  Full_Text PDF 257 KB Download: 315 times | | References:[1] Teasdale, T. W., Owen, D. R. (2005). A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse. Personality and Individual Differences, 39 (4) (September), 837 – 843, Elsevier.
[2] Flynn, J. R. (2009). What Is Intelligence: Beyond the Flynn Effect. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.
[3] Computing laws revisited (2013). Computer 46/12.
[4] Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine, 4.
[5] Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13) (2013). Beijing, China.
[6] Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. New York: Viking Books.
[7] Dean, T. (2009). A review of the Drake equation. Cosmos Magazine.
[8] Wolfram A. (2014). http://mathworld. wolfram.com/UnexpectedHangingParadox.html
[9] Unexpected hanging paradox, Wikipedia (2014). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unexpected_hanging_paradox&oldid=611543144, (June).
[10] Chow, T. Y. (1998). The surprise examination or unexpected hanging paradox. American Mathematical Monthly 105:41–51.
[11] Sober, E. (1998). To give a surprise exam, use game theory. Synthese 115:355–73.
[12] O’Connor, D. J. (1948). Pragmatic paradoxes. Mind 57: 358–9.
[13] Beall, J. C., Glanzberg, M. (2013). In: Edward N. Zalta, E.N. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[14] Prior, A. N. (1976). Papers in Logic and Ethics. Duckworth.
[15] Gams, M. (2001). Weak Intelligence: Through the Principle and Paradox of Multiple Knowledge. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
[16] Sorensen, R. A. (1988). Blindspots. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
[17] Young, H. P. (2007). The possible and the impossible in multi-agent learning. Artificial Intelligence 171/7.
[18] Turner, R. M. (1993). Context-sensitive Reasoning for Autonomous Agents and Cooperative Distributed Problem Solving, In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Using Knowledge in its Context, Chambery, France.
[19] Gams, M. (2014). The Unexpected Hanging Paradox from an AI Viewpoint, Informatica 38, 181–185. |
 |
|
