@article {213,
	title = {A survey on delivery context description formats - A comparison and mapping model},
	journal = {Journal of Digital Information Management},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2010},
	note = {Cited By (since 1996):2Export Date: 10 July 2014},
	month = {2010},
	pages = {16 - 27},
	abstract = {Nowadays, mobile devices have implemented several transmission technologies which enable access to the Internet and increase the bit rate for data exchange. Despite modern mobile processors and high-resolution displays, mobile devices will never reach the stage of a powerful notebook or desktop system (for example, due to the fact of battery powered CPUs or just concerning the small-sized displays). Due to these limitations, the deliverable content for these devices should be adapted based on their capabilities including a variety of aspects (e.g., from terminal to network characteristics). These capabilities should be described in an interoperable way. In practice, however, there are many standards available and a common mapping model between these standards is not in place. Therefore, in this paper we describe such a mapping model and its implementation aspects. In particular, we focus on the whole delivery context (i.e., terminal capabilities, network characteristics, user preferences, etc.) and investigated the two most prominent state-of-the-art description schemes, namely User Agent Profi le (UAProf) and Usage Environment Description (UED).},
	keywords = {CC/PP, DCO, Delivery Context, Metadata, UAProf, UED.t},
	url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77958067245\&partnerID=40\&md5=4ec9bec6bf35fd2f1a58a4be7f5ec64a},
	author = {Timmerer, C. and Jabornig, J. and Hellwagner, H.}
}
